Practice Test 1
No, there is a limit of 2 PGP sponsorships per person
No,he would only be able to sponsor his biological parents without anyone else joining them.
Yes, though he would sponsor his biological parent and they would include the step-parents as a dependent.
Yes, because he would sponsor the entire group together on the same application.
Rate this question:
It affects the sponsorship in terms of the money John needs to prove.
It doesn't affect the sponsorship because the daughter is eligible.
It doesn't affect the sponsorship as long as they put her on the application.
It affects the sponsorship because Nathan and Loretta now do not qualify.
Rate this question:
No, there needs to be a genuine father-son relationship.
No, only his mother can obtain PR under the Family Class.
Yes, but only if they establish and can prove a genuine father -son relationship after he arrives in Canada.
Yes, there is no obstacle to Guilermo obtaining PR under the Family Class.
Rate this question:
Around $25,000
Around $37,000
Around $50,000
As much as possible.
Rate this question:
He wouldn't be able to sponsor Nathan and Loretta.
The size of the family would then be 5 family members.
The size of the family would then be 6 family members.
The size of the family would then be 7 family members.
Rate this question:
No, because she does not meet the minimum requirements to move on the Pool of Qualified Candiates.
Yes, but only if the CRS cuf-off is above 490 points.
Yes, because she meets the minimum requirements of both the FSW and CEC stream and her CRS points exceed the minimum amount of points.
No, because even though she qualifies for the Federal Skilled Worker and Canadian Experience Class, she would not likely have enough CRS points.
Rate this question:
Her CRS points would still be above 450.
He points would reamin the same.
She would not qualify for the FSWP anymore.
Her points would drop below the 450 CRS points.
Rate this question:
An LMIA.
A contract.
Proof that she qualifies for job.
A promissory note from a Canadian employer.
Rate this question:
Age:100, Education:112, Language:60, Canadian Experience:0
Age:105, Education:120, Language:64, Canadian Experience:70
Age:110, Education:120, Language:64, Canadian Experience:80
Age:95, Education:112, Language:68, Canadian Experience:70
Rate this question:
No, because that would breach confidentiality.
No, because that would breach professionalism.
No, because that would breach quality service.
No, because that would breach competence.
Rate this question:
Get written permission from Julio to be able to share all information with his brother.
Have 2 retainer agreements: one for Julio and one for his brother.
Have the brother sponsor Julio so you can share all information.
Have a joint retainer with both Julio and Rivaldo.
Rate this question:
No, this is not a violation of any ICCRC rules and regulations.
No, this is acceptable as long as Rivaldo signs a release form.
Yes, this is a violation of the use of the ICCRC's Designation section of the COE.
Yes, this is a violation of the Testimonials section of the COE.
Rate this question:
People on the International Exoerience Canada Program.
People taking a course over 6 months in length.
Holders of a CSQ.
People with an acceptance letter from a university.
Rate this question:
No, because of the location of his studies.
Yes, because of the topic of his studies.
Yes, because of the length of time of his studies.
No,because of the length of time of his studies.
Rate this question:
No, because his new course is under 1 month in length.
Yes, because he now exceeds 5 months in total.
Yes, because he will now get a Post Grad work Permit.
No, because any of his courses are over 6 months in length.
Rate this question:
No, because he landed in the USA first.
No, because he hasn't proven that he could not find protection in another city in Brazil.
Yes, because he qualifies for an exception to the Safe Third Country Agreement.
Yes, because he can choose to make a claim anywhere in the world, regardless of where he travels to first.
Rate this question:
Not unless he can show that his human rights are being violated.
Yes, if he can show that a certain company does not hire gay people.
No, because the discrimination he is facing is not based on race or religion.
Yes, because he was a victim of discrimination before he left the country.
Rate this question:
None
Public Interest Exception
Family Member Exception
PRRA Exception.
Rate this question:
If she can score a CLB 5 in her exam, she would meet the minimum requirements of the Federal Skilled Worker, Skilled Trades and Canadian Experience Class.
If she can obtain an IELTS score of Band 6 in each area of the exam, she would meet the minimum requirements of the Federal Skilled Worker, Skilled Trades and Canadian Experience Class.
If she can obtain an average IELTS score of Band 6 overall, she would meet the minimum requirements of the Federal Skilled Worker, Skilled Trades and Canadian Experience Class.
Her previous language exam results are still valid and qualify her for the Canadian Experience Class and the Federal Skilled Trades Program.
Rate this question:
She would progress to the Pool of Candidates but would not have many points under education.
She would not meet the requirements of any program through Express Entry, so she would not progress to the Pool of Qualified Candidates.
She would qualify for all three programs that fo through Express Entry regardless of the ECA.
She would not qualify for any programs in Express Entry but would still be able to apply for a PRRA if she explains that she doesn't want to go back to her country.
Rate this question:
Yes, because she will have more education points.
Yes, because she will have more education and work experience points.
Yes, because she will have more work experience points.
Yes, because she would have the same number of CRS points as she currently has.
Rate this question:
Yes, because the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that Augustin will engage in espionage.
No, because Augustin hasn't yet engaged in an illegal act, so there is no way of knowing for sure.
Yes, because the officer believes that Augustin received a higher salary that usual conducting consulting work for Aero-Paraguay.
No, because an officer does not have the authority for this assessment because cases of potential espionage must be analzed by CSIS instead.
Rate this question:
No because the level of proof needed for inadmissibility for PR is higher than it is for TR.
No because the level of proof needed for inadmissibility for TR is higher than it is for PR.
No because Paraguay has a Free Trade Agreement with Canada, so Augustin would not need to be screened for neither the work permit, not the PR application.
No, because the admissiblity requirements for TR and PR status are the same in this case.
Rate this question:
No, because only espionage activities against the Canadian Government are covered under A34,
Yes, because these activities still make him inadmissible even if they are against a Canadian company.
No, because Augustin was not spying on behalf of a foreign government; only on behalf of a foreign company.
Yes, because these activities qualify as international rights violations.
Rate this question:
She has already met the requirements because she arrived in Canada in 2014.
She has already exceeded the residency time and now qualifies.
She needs approzimately 7 more months in Canada.
She needs approximately 2 more months in Cananda.
Rate this question:
The Citizenship Judge
The CBSA officer
Any person designated by the recipient
The RCMP officer
Rate this question:
She would not need to inform the Singapore government of her Canadian citizenship, so she can keep both nationalities.
She would not need to inform the Canadian government of her Singapore citizenship, so she can keep both nationalities.
If she does not take Canadian citizenship when she qualifies, she might lose her PR status, even if she remains in Canada.
She would have to decide whish one nationality she would rather keep.
Rate this question:
The ICCRC
The Client
The Errors and Omissions provider
There is no need to contact any of the above
Rate this question:
Obtain information from client to complete their files.
Receive payments from clients.
Provide advice to clients.
Make deposits in the client account.
Rate this question:
Yes, he needs another room for the secretary.
Yes, he is not allowed to practice at home.
No, he can practice wherever he wants.
Yes, he cannot have client property in an open closet.
Rate this question:
That he only needs $20,000 to sponsor a spouse and her children.
NO LICO is needed.
That he needs $30,000 to sponsor a spouse and her children.
He cannot sponsor them because it is not bona fide marriage.
Rate this question:
No, there would be no issue in this circumstance.
There would not be an issue in this circumstance, but the family would have to wait until the daughter is deemed rehabilitated to begin the immigration process.
Yes, Naivi and her dependent children are inadmissible.
Naivi would now only be able to sponsor her other daughter to join her in Canada.
Rate this question:
No. Regardless of the crime, if the person was under the age of 18, they would not be inadmissible because of this crime.
Yes, but only if the person would have been convicted as an adult in Canada.
No. Regardless of the crime, if the person was under the age of 22, they would not be inadmissible because of this crime.
Yes, but only if the person was charged as a Young Offender.
Rate this question:
Yes - any time a foreign national conducts paid work in Canada, a work permit is needed.
No - there is an exemption in this case.
Yes - but he would have to make sure that Chong's law firm would pay him outside of Canada.
No - he would be classified as a Business Visitor under the NAFTA.
Rate this question:
Only if he is getting paid for the event.
No, because the topic relates to Canada's national interest.
No, because he will be at this panel for less than 5 days.
No, because the event is hosted by Designated Learning Institution.
Rate this question:
Yes, if there are reasonable grounds and he includes detailed notes in the CAIPS.
Yes, the officers can reject an application for any reason.
No, the Officer cannot reject a work permit application for this reason.
No, the officer can only send the application for a Judicial Review.
Rate this question:
She meets the minimum requirements of the Federal Skilled Trades Program and would likely move on into the pool of Canadidates, where she may get a job offer or a provincial nomination.
She does not meet the minimum requirements of the Federal Skilled Trades Program.
Though she qualifies under the Federal Skilled Trades Program, she is not likely to gain many CRS points in Express Entry.
She would need to continue her studies and become an Electrical Engineer in or order to qualify for the Federal Skilled Trades Program.
Rate this question:
The job offer would move the CRS points up to 835.
The job offer would do nothing for CRS points without an LMIA.
The Job offer would help Yang exceed the CRS cut-off score because she was nominated by a company in a province.
The job offer would only help Yang if she accepted it.
Rate this question:
The job offer meets the criteria to be considered as qualifying.
Her contract hours are not enough to be considered full-time, so she is not eligible.
She cannot be offered employment from two separate Canadian employers, so she will have to choose one.
The job offer must be for 2 years, so she would not be accepted under the Federal Skilled Trades Program.
Rate this question:
No, because Harpreet was working for a Canadian company all this time.
No, because there is still time left for him to meet the required time in Canada.
Yes, because the job does not meet the requirements according to IRPA.
Yes, because Permanent Residents must be physically present in Canada to complete their residency obligations.
Rate this question:
Her residency requirements were being met until Harpreet lost his status.
If she stays in India, she will likely lose her PR status within the next 3 years.
She would have lost her PR status in 2014 when she left the country.
She is now inadmissible to Canada for accompanying an inadmissible family member.
Rate this question:
Yes, because if they choose to have a child one day, it would be in the child's best interest to have Canadian citizenship.
Yes, because they will face unusual and undeserved hardship by losing their PR status.
Yes, because although they have no plans of settling in Canada, having PR status makes it easier to travel there each summer.
No, because they will not likely face unusual and undeserved hardship by losing their PR status.
Rate this question:
No, there should always be a written agreement.
Yes, if there isn't any money involved, they don't need an agreement.
No, She cannot take pro-bono cases without the council authorization.
Yes, she can decide when to have an agreement.
Rate this question:
10 hours
11 hours
16 hours
6 hours
Rate this question:
Yes, as long as she keeps her status as an RCIC.
No, She needs to be a member of the MIDI and not the ICCRC.
No, she needs to be a member of the ICCRC and MIDI.
Yes, as long as she maintains her status as an RCIC and lives in Quebec.
Rate this question:
An RCIC who speaks French.
An RCIC who is a member of the MIDI.
An RCIC who is a member of the MIDI as long as Reba does not receive a commission.
She can represent these clients herself, so there is no need to refer them to someone else.
Rate this question:
A person with a removal order who has left Canada.
A person with a removal order who has appeared before an officer to confirm the departure.
A Person with a removal order who has obtained a certificate of departune.
All of the above.
Rate this question:
Yes, because removal orders remain activated until 5 years after they are made.
Yes, because removal orders remain activated until they are enforced.
No, because removal orders remain activated only if the person volunteers to leave the country.
Yes, because removal orders remain activated until the person can prove he meets the LICO.
Rate this question:
No, the removal costs were covered by an emergency fund and do not need to be paid back.
No, the removal costs were under the threshold needed to activate an inadmissibility charge.
Yes, the funds need to be repaid before he can return to Canada.
Yes, the fund will be attached to the invoice sent to him to cover the application fees in Express Entry.
Rate this question:
No, none of the time he worked in Canada counts towards the CEC requirements.
Yes, he lived in Canada at the time, so the full 3 years count.
Yes, but only the time during which he was a refugee claimant counts.
No, only the time he spent working after he made his refugee claim, but before he was deported counts.
Rate this question:
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.